Tom King worked in CIA counterterrorism before he wrote comics, and he has said the thing he brought back was an interest in what damage does to people who keep going anyway. That is the whole shelf, and it is why the reaction to it splits so cleanly.
No modern Batman run divides readers like this one. Being clear about why is more useful than recommending it.
What defines his writing
Repetition as structure. He repeats phrases, panels and beats deliberately, so meaning accumulates through variation rather than through plot. When it works, a line you have read four times lands like a hammer on the fifth. When it does not, it reads as stalling.
The grid. He writes to rigid page layouts, most famously nine equal panels, which forces a steady rhythm and makes any break from it significant. It is a formal discipline almost nobody else in mainstream superhero comics imposes on themselves.
Trauma as the actual subject. His Batman is not a detective story with emotional colour. It is a book about whether a person built out of a childhood catastrophe is capable of being happy, and it commits to that question for its whole length.
Endings that withhold. He resists catharsis. Arcs finish on an unresolved beat far more often than on a victory, which is either the honest choice or the frustrating one depending on what you came for.
The Batman run
Batman by Tom King Omnibus Vol. 1 at 776 pages and Vol. 2 at 800 pages collect the run.
The plot, stated plainly: Batman decides he wants to be happy, pursues a relationship with Catwoman toward marriage, and the book examines whether the character can survive getting what he wants. Around that sit some of the most formally ambitious single issues DC published in the decade, and some stretches where very little happens on purpose.
People who love this run consider it the only Batman story that takes his interior life seriously. People who resent it consider it a slow book that spends a thousand pages avoiding being a Batman comic. Both descriptions are accurate. Which one you agree with is a matter of what you want from the character, and it is worth deciding before you spend the money.
For a Batman run built the opposite way — escalation, horror, plot every issue — the Scott Snyder guide covers the obvious alternative.
The Grayson years
Grayson: The Superspy Omnibus at 512 pages is the book to read if the Batman run sounds too heavy, and it is genuinely underrated.
Dick Grayson loses his secret identity and is sent undercover as a spy, and the result is fast, funny and structurally playful in a way the Batman run rarely allows itself. It is the most purely entertaining thing on this shelf and the easiest recommendation.
Nightwing: Rebirth Omnibus at 1,496 pages continues that character's story into the era covered in the Bruno Redondo guide, with a rotating creative team.
Whatever is obtainable at a given moment sits at the top of the Tom King page. If you are building a DC collection more broadly, the DC omnibus page is the place to browse.
Where to start
One recommendation, and it is deliberately not the famous one: Grayson: The Superspy Omnibus. It shows the formal skill without the emotional weight, it is short, and it will tell you whether you like how he constructs a page before you commit to 1,576 pages of Batman being sad.
If you already know you want the Batman run, start at Vol. 1 and read it as one novel rather than as a monthly comic. It does not survive being sampled.
Who should skip this shelf
This is the clearest case on our shelves where the honest answer is that many readers will not enjoy it. If you want a Batman who solves crimes, if repetition reads to you as padding, or if you want a superhero comic to resolve, this run will annoy you for a very long time at considerable expense. The people who love it are not wrong either — they are getting something no other Batman book offers — but it is not a safe recommendation and pretending otherwise would be a disservice.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.